Skip to main content


Adopted: January 15, 1993

Opinion rules that a partner of a lawyer who represents a party to an arbitration should not act as an arbitrator.

Editor's Note: This opinion was originally published as RPC 138 (Revised).


Client A entered into a contract for the sale of his business with Client B. The contract of sale contained an arbitration clause wherein it provided that should a dispute arise between A and B regarding any matter to be performed by A and B under the contract, that A should elect an arbitrator and B should elect an arbitrator and the two arbitrators should elect a third. Subsequent to the transfer and sale of the business, a genuine dispute arose between A and B, and Attorney X (on behalf of Client A) demanded arbitration and selected as an arbitrator Attorney O, who is not a member of Attorney X's law firm nor associated with him in any manner. In response to the demand for arbitration, Attorney Y (for Client B) served notice on Attorney X that they selected Attorney P as their arbitrator. Attorney P is a partner in Attorney Y's law firm.

May Attorney P serve as an arbitrator?


No. In order to avoid even the appearance of impropriety, a lawyer should never undertake to serve as an arbitrator in a case in which his or her partner represents one of the parties to the arbitration. Canon IX.

Back to top