Skip to main content

Consultation with Lawyer as Prospective Mediator

Adopted: July 23, 2010

Opinion rules that a lawyer who consults with both parties to a dispute relative to the lawyer's prospective service as a mediator may not subsequently represent one of the parties to the dispute.


Lawyer consulted with Husband on two occasions about separating from Wife. During both meetings, only questions about mediating the marital dissolution were discussed.

Wife attended the third consultation with Lawyer. At the meeting, Lawyer disclosed the prior two meetings with Husband. He also advised Wife that he would remain "neutral" during the meeting with her; would not give either party legal advice; and would only discuss the mediation process. Wife informed Lawyer that she was represented by her own lawyer. Lawyer told Wife that he was willing to serve as the mediator for the marital dispute/dissolution if her lawyer advised her to agree. Lawyer also told Wife that he had discussed his potential roles as either advocate or mediator with Husband in the prior meetings and that, for the present, Husband chose to keep Lawyer "neutral."

At their request, Lawyer subsequently sent a separation checklist to both Husband and Wife. The checklist gives information about the issues a separation agreement should address. It does not provide substantive advice.

Wife consulted with her lawyer and decided not to pursue mediation. Husband would now like to employ Lawyer as his advocate in the equitable distribution action filed by Wife. May Lawyer represent Husband in the equitable distribution action?


No. If Lawyer was acting in the role of a mediator when he consulted with Wife, Rule 1.12(a), Former Judge, Arbitrator, Mediator, or Other Third-Party Neutral, prohibits him from representing anyone in connection with a matter in which he participated personally and substantially as a mediator unless all of the parties to the proceeding give informed consent confirmed in writing. Although the mediation never occurred, Lawyer still held himself out to be a neutral and had substantive discussions with Wife about the mediation process. Therefore, he participated substantially in the mediation process and, to protect the integrity of the neutral role of mediators, he is disqualified from representing Husband without the consent of Wife.

Back to top