(a) A lawyer may communicate information regarding the lawyer's services through any media.

(b) A lawyer shall not compensate, give, or promise anything of value to a person for recommending the lawyer's services except that a lawyer may

(1) pay the reasonable costs of advertisements or communications permitted by this Rule;

(2) pay the usual charges of an intermediary organization that complies with Rule 7.4, or a prepaid legal services plan that complies with 27 N.C. Admin. Code 1E.0301 et seq.;

(3) pay for a law practice in accordance with Rule 1.17; and

(4) give nominal gifts as an expression of appreciation that are neither intended nor reasonably expected to be a form of compensation for recommending a lawyer's services.

(c) A lawyer shall not state that the lawyer specializes or is a specialist in a field of practice unless:

(1) the lawyer is certified as a specialist in the field of practice by:

(A) the North Carolina State Bar;

(B) an organization that is accredited by the North Carolina State Bar; or

(C) an organization that is accredited by the American Bar Association under procedures and criteria endorsed by the North Carolina State Bar; and

(2) the name of the certifying organization is clearly identified in the communication.

(d) Any communication made under this Rule must include the name and contact information of at least one lawyer or law firm responsible for its content.

Comment

[1] This Rule permits public dissemination of information concerning a lawyer's or law firm's name, address, email address, website, and telephone number; the kinds of services the lawyer will undertake; the basis on which the lawyer's fees are determined, including prices for specific services and payment and credit arrangements; a lawyer's foreign language ability; names of references and, with their consent, names of clients regularly represented; and other information that might invite the attention of those seeking legal assistance.

Paying Others to Recommend a Lawyer

[2] Except as permitted under paragraphs (b)(1)-(b)(4), lawyers are not permitted to pay others for recommending the lawyer's services. A communication contains a recommendation if it endorses or vouches for a lawyer's credentials, abilities, competence, character, or other professional qualities. Directory listings and group advertisements that list lawyers by practice area, without more, do not constitute impermissible "recommendations."

[3] Paragraph (b)(1) allows a lawyer to pay for advertising and communications permitted by this Rule, including the costs of print directory listings, on-line directory listings, newspaper ads, television and radio airtime, domain-name registrations, sponsorship fees, Internet-based advertisements, and group advertising. A lawyer may compensate employees, agents, and vendors who are engaged to provide marketing or client-development services, such as publicists, public-relations personnel, business-development staff, television and radio station employees or spokespersons, and website designers.

[4] Paragraph (b)(4) permits a lawyer to give nominal gifts as an expression of appreciation to a person for recommending the lawyer's services or referring a prospective client. The gift may not be more than a token item as might be given for holidays or other ordinary social hospitality. A gift is prohibited if offered or given in consideration of any promise, agreement, or understanding that such a gift would be forthcoming or that referrals would be made or encouraged in the future.

Paying Lead Generators

[5] A lawyer may pay others for generating client leads, such as Internet-based client leads, as long as the lead generator does not recommend the lawyer, any payment to the lead generator is consistent with Rules 1.5(e) (division of fees) and 5.4 (professional independence of the lawyer), and the lead generator's communications are consistent with Rule 7.1 (communications concerning a lawyer's services). To comply with Rule 7.1, a lawyer must not pay a lead generator that states, implies, or creates a reasonable impression that it is recommending the lawyer, is making the referral without payment from the lawyer, or has analyzed a person's legal problems when determining which lawyer should receive the referral. See Comment [2] (definition of "recommendation"). See also Rule 5.3 (duties of lawyers and law firms with respect to the conduct of nonlawyers); Rule 8.4(a)(duty to avoid violating the Rules through the acts of another).

Referrals from Intermediary Organizations and Prepaid Legal Service Plans

[6] A lawyer who accepts assignments or referrals from a prepaid legal service plan or referrals from an intermediary organization must act reasonably to assure that the activities of the plan or organization are compatible with the lawyer's professional obligations. See Rule 5.3, Rule 7.3, and Rule 7.4. A prepaid legal service plan assists people who seek to secure legal representation. Intermediary organizations, including lawyer referral services, are understood by the public to be consumer-oriented organizations that provide unbiased referrals to lawyers with appropriate experience in the subject matter of the representation and afford other client protections, such as complaint procedures or malpractice insurance requirements. Prepaid legal service plans and intermediary organizations may communicate with the public, but such communication must be in conformity with these Rules; notably, such communication must not be false or misleading.

Specialty Certification

[7] The use of the word "specialize" in any of its variant forms connotes to the public a particular expertise often subject to recognition by the state. Indeed, the North Carolina State Bar has instituted programs providing for official certification of specialists in certain areas of practice. Certification signifies that an objective entity has recognized an advanced degree of knowledge and experience in the specialty area greater than is suggested by general licensure to practice law. Certifying organizations are expected to apply standards of experience, knowledge, and proficiency to ensure that a lawyer's recognition as a specialist is meaningful and reliable. To avoid misrepresentation and deception, a lawyer may not communicate that the lawyer has been recognized or certified as a specialist in a particular field of law, except as provided by this Rule. The Rule requires that a representation of specialty may be made only if the certifying organization is the North Carolina State Bar, an organization accredited by the North Carolina State Bar, or an organization accredited by the American Bar Association under procedures approved by the North Carolina State Bar. To ensure that consumers can obtain access to useful information about an organization granting certification, the name of the certifying organization or agency must be included in any communication regarding the certification.

[8] A lawyer may, however, describe his or her practice without using the term "specialize" in any manner which is truthful and not misleading. This Rule specifically permits a lawyer to indicate areas of practice in communications about the lawyer's services. If a lawyer practices only in certain fields, or will not accept matters except in a specified field or fields, the lawyer is permitted to so indicate. The lawyer may, for instance, indicate a "concentration" or an "interest" or a "limitation."

Contact Information

[9] This Rule requires that any communication about a lawyer or law firm's services include the name of, and contact information for, the lawyer or law firm. Contact information includes a website address, a telephone number, an email address, or a physical office location.

History Note:

Authority G.S. 84-23;

Adopted by the Supreme Court: July 24, 1997;

Amendments Approved by the Supreme Court: March 1, 2003; October 2, 2014; September 28, 2017; April 21, 2021.

Related Ethics Opinions

CPR 14

Adopted

CPR 39

Adopted

CPR 40

Adopted

CPR 58

Adopted

CPR 116

Adopted

CPR 336

Adopted

CPR 359

Adopted

RPC 10: Private Lawyer Referral Service

Adopted
October 24, 1986

RPC 43: Advertisement of Board Certification of Specialty

Adopted
July 15, 1988

RPC 94: Private Lawyer Referral Service

Adopted
July 13, 1990

RPC 115: Sponsorship of Legal Information

Adopted
October 18, 1991

RPC 135: Advertisement of a Lawyer as the "Best"

Adopted
July 17, 1992

RPC 161: Television Commercials for Legal Services

Adopted
April 15, 1994

RPC 239: Advertising on the Internet

Adopted
October 18, 1996

RPC 241: Participating in a Directory of Lawyers on the Internet

Adopted
January 24, 1997

2004 Formal Ethics Opinion 1: Participation in On-Line Legal Matching Service

Adopted
April 23, 2004

2004 Formal Ethics Opinion 2: Offer of Promotional Merchandise in a Targeted Direct Mail Solicitation Letter

Adopted
April 23, 2004

2005 Formal Ethics Opinion 10: Virtual Law Practice and Unbundled Legal Services

Adopted
January 20, 2006

2006 Formal Ethics Opinion 7: Participation in a For-Profit Networking Organization

Adopted
October 20, 2006

2007 Formal Ethics Opinion 4: Solicitation after Seminar, Gifts to Clients and Others, and Distribution of Business Cards

Adopted
April 25, 2008

2010 Formal Ethics Opinion 4: Lawyer Participating in Barter Exchange

Adopted
October 29, 2010

2011 Formal Ethics Opinion 4: Participation in Referral Arrangement

Adopted
April 27, 2012

2011 Formal Ethics Opinion 10: Lawyer Advertising on Deal of the Day or Group Coupon Website

Adopted
October 21, 2011

2012 Formal Ethics Opinion 6: Use of Leased Time-Shared Office Address or Post Office Address on Letterhead and Advertising

Adopted
October 26, 2012

2012 Formal Ethics Opinion 10: Participation as a “Network” Lawyer for Company Providing Litigation or Administrative Support Services

Adopted
January 25, 2013

2013 Formal Ethics Opinion 10: Participation in Online Group Legal Advertising Using Territorial Exclusivity

Adopted
October 25, 2013

2017 Formal Ethics Opinion 1: Text Message Advertising

Adopted
April 21, 2017

2017 Formal Ethics Opinion 3: Advertisement with URL and No Other Identifying Information

Adopted
July 28, 2017

2018 Formal Ethics Opinion 1: Participation in Website Directories and Rating Systems that include Third Party Reviews

Adopted
July 27, 2018

2018 Formal Ethics Opinion 7: Online Review Solicitation Service

Adopted
October 26, 2018

2019 Formal Ethics Opinion 6: Offering Incentive to Engage with Law Practice’s Social Networking Sites

Adopted
October 25, 2019

2022 Formal Ethics Opinion 3: Inclusion on Allied Professional’s List of Recommended Lawyers

Adopted
July 22, 2022